Workshop 3
2023 CARO-COMP JSM Evaluation, Friday, September 22
*
Please indicate your profession
Radiation Oncology
Medical Physicist
Radiation Therapist
CARO Trainee
COMP Trainee
Other: Please sepcify
Please specify.
*
Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity:
Check all that apply.
Collaborator
Communicator
Health Advocate
Manager
Medical Expert
Professional
Scholar
Workshop 3 - Need-to-know AI for Non-experts: How to Differentiate Between Good and Bad AI
Hossein Naseri, Kayla O’Sullivan-Steben
By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
Understand the difference between good and bad AI tools/research in radiation oncology and medical physics.
Have hands-on experience testing how the performance of an AI model can be influenced by changes in model parameters and database characteristics.
Evaluate and critique AI tools and research for their clinical acceptability.
Presentation Evaluation
*
The session was appropriate to my practice.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
I acquired new knowledge from this session.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
This session met my needs.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
The session will help me modify my practice.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
I was satisfied with the organization of this session.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
The presenter demonstrated a thorough understanding of the subject.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
The presenter demonstrated a proficiency in speaking.
Agree - 1
Neutral - 2
Disagree - 3
*
Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation?
Yes
No
If yes, please comment:
*
Did the presenter make a disclosure statement? (verbal and with slide)
Yes
No
Not sure
If no, please comment:
*
Please use this comment box for any concerns regarding the last two questions. Kindly include your name.
*
General Comments:
Powered by
SimpleSurvey